I need help rewriting this to make it comprehendible. Can anyone help a sista out on this? The point is to try and show an example of the difference between how Democrats see regulations and Republicans (should see) see regulations. All though I really mean conservatives as the GOP is infested with neo-cons. Ok so here is the question when CEO's earn money without accountability for their performance, That is wrong, to draw millions from their company when the company is bordering on financial failure. No one is disputing that, That is Greed. •To the conservative it is fair to say we believe Free markets only work when there is full information, full accountability and full response to activities that adjust in the market. And that is where regulations come in, Conservatives hold the premise that accountability should to upheld and yet standards not dictated. That should be left to the free market or the will of the people. From the type of product and what it is made out of to How much someone is paid or not paid for doing a job from minimum wage to Stock holders and CEO’s – If a company like what has recently happens pays failing CEO’s bonuses it is the contention of conservatives that we the people should be outraged and then not buy that companies products or services to show we wont stand for it But not have government come in to a private business and say you must do this or that, Does that make sense to Democrats- the difference of how we see regulations? Though if a company is going to take a “Bailout” Which is pathetic and they shouldn’t be offered but if they are going to be part of that THEN and ONLY then does government have a right to dictate any terms it wants as you are not essentially owed buy the government.